Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969

images 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. 1969 Pontiac Fire Bird Trans
  • 1969 Pontiac Fire Bird Trans



  • madhuvj
    09-17 11:50 PM
    Administrator2,

    I know you guys have been doing a great job. I joined around july last year and have been a regular visitor to your site. Actually, I was just active on the thread that GCStatus has started. I dont think he ever used derogatory statements against any of the admin. Infact, he has posted for a help from admin on more than 4 occassions with out any proper response. Actually, If you look at this thread, it was some one else who had commented admins are on vacation and will not be back until july 2009. It was not GCStatus who said that. He just replied to that . He had no clue about what you guys are up to. So let us stop this leadership fight. Now that, you have clearly told you cannot hardwire that thread on the front page. Well, we cant do much about it now, since we are at your help here. If you think, GCStatus has said any thing bad about you, please can you post it, because i did not find any comments about admin.

    Thanks
    VJ
    GCStatus,

    We would like to pass the baton to you. Its not "my" website. You are free to take it. Kindly let us your a number to reach you and we will start the transition process.

    Thanks,


    BTW, no one is telling you the credentials, just letting you know that your rude posting about Admins hiding in a secret place is not appreciated. You cut-past one post, what about your other posts. Do you want me to post them here? Now lets get back to "ownership" and "rudeness" debate because it always turns out that way. You can say anything and if Admin responds, all of a sudden Admin is showing attitude, Admin is rude, freedom of speech, Ist amendment, Admins is dictators, Admins are like Hitler etc etc . Nothing new, we have seen this story repeat countless times.

    And one more thing, you are busy and others have all the free time in the world. Is that right?

    We never received any email from you. I think you mean 4-5 posts. We did not believe that there was merit in responding to your posts. There is only so much time in a day. We can not practically respond to most of the posts, even if we want. But as I mentioned earlier, not responding to a post doesn't give you license to be rude and then later call it a joke. Its not funny because we take this effort very seriously. Our information is in public domain and we are very much reachable. Whereas you have put in bogus information in your profile and we think that using anonymous handle, you are attacking this effort. With this effort we have developed think skin because we have heard a lot of times from naysayers. But sometimes, like today, we do feel the need to respond to needless attacks/nagging/poking.





    wallpaper 1969 Pontiac Fire Bird Trans Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. 1969 Pontiac Trans AM Firebird
  • 1969 Pontiac Trans AM Firebird



  • ragz4u
    05-09 12:19 PM
    I am working with the same company for the last 5 years. Completing 6 years on H1 here and the attorney decided to file for LC couple of days before the old system was to come to an end.
    I hold a Masters degree in Engineering but I came to know later that they filed the petition in EB3 category.

    I have been waiting for over an year to file the PERM petition because first I wanted to get my 7 th year H1 extension using the old petition.No clear guidance on multiple filing of petitions is creating lot of confusion for people who are in the 6 th year of H1 status.

    Just before retrogression started, got a chance to substitute labor with another company but I could not forego my permanent position/bonus for the chance to get GC sooner and so decided to work with the same company.
    Now my company may close in the next 1-2 years and I will have to start my GC process all over.Even after working here for 6 years with the same company, there is no portability of the process. It is the individual who wants the GC and the Govt should decide to give this.

    You have employer/attorney in between who are greatly benefiting due to the helplessness of the employee and the careless attitude of the Govt.
    I still want to believe that the system will be fixed and people will be treated fairly.

    I am in the final phase of getting my Canadian PR card and I do not want to entirely pin my hopes on getting a GC here.

    It is unbelievable how this country which encourages people to play by rules has such a broken immigration system.





    Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
  • Pontiac Firebird Trans Am



  • Goodintentions
    04-14 03:00 PM
    Even after having such a relaxed immigration rules, only leftovers go to Canada, UK and Australia.

    ======

    Your point about left overs is perfectly right, no arguments. Thank you.

    However, kindly note that immigrant friendly laws and economic (job) opportunities are different subjects.

    People do not want to go to other countries because the job oppportunities are less. Not because the immigration rules are bad :)

    People want to come to the USA because job opportunities are better, not because the immigration rules are friendly :)

    Here in IV we are purely dicussing immigration. That is our main agenda.

    Thank you..





    2011 1969 Pontiac Trans AM Firebird Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
  • 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am



  • villamonte6100
    08-10 11:27 AM
    My opinion is that you should be fine. Just make sure that you've nailed everything down correctly on your G-325A.

    This might be a side track but what types of questions INS ask during GC interview.

    ANYONE?



    more...


    Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
  • 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am



  • javadeveloper
    07-22 09:52 PM
    Ok, so if I file the i-140/i-485 now and leave the country with a new stamp.

    what do you mean by new stamp ? once you apply for I-485 , you need to wait until you get your I-485 reciept# to leave country.

    Now, if my I-140 is approved after that, and then my i-485 is looked at after that date, will I considered to be in status then, because when they are looking at the AOS application, I have already left and returned to the country??

    I guess you have to get new I-94 and submit that new I-94 to USCIS.

    Or should be in status the day the AOS petition is filed and even if i leave/re-enter the country after that, it does not matter?!

    I am not sure , gurus please answer this question..Let us know if get any info regarding this because I am in simillar situation.





    Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. PONTIAC FIREBIRD TRANS AM
  • PONTIAC FIREBIRD TRANS AM



  • sledge_hammer
    07-09 12:40 PM
    I had voted "No" initially, but I have sent flowers anyway...



    more...


    Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
  • 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am



  • paskal
    09-07 11:26 PM
    if we as a community have a good answer to this challenge
    then we don't need vitriol.

    he is mocking us.
    he is baiting us.
    so let me ask- is everyone on this thread going to DC? if you are then say so, he is challenging you to show that you are not all bark
    if you are not going, time to reconsider your reasons.

    i am going. i will be there starting saturday the 15th
    i am not all rhetoric. i will stand up for myself.
    you- tribbiani- do what you have to. i will do what i should.
    so who is joining me?





    2010 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
  • 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am



  • amsgc
    08-21 05:49 PM
    Dude,
    I just saw this post and I would like to understand a bit more about what you read. So, I have two questions for you:

    1. What is your EB category?
    2. What exactly did the memo say? Now be careful and think hard before you post.
    For instance, you may cover the following in your post:
    - Who was it addressed to?
    - What was the subject?
    - Was it about about EB or FB?
    - Did it mention any dates?
    - Did it mention any country names?
    - Was there anything about what the adjudicators are supposed to do?
    - Which city/state was this?

    Your response will be very helpful.

    Thanks.


    ...
    She then said, we just received this memo and let me read it and said this supersedes everything and even everything is clear for you nothing will happen, asking me if I was from India/China hesitantly as she could fingure out I was from India, untill new visas are allocated in October. .

    .



    more...


    Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. Pontiac Firebird Trans Am Top
  • Pontiac Firebird Trans Am Top



  • paskal
    12-19 02:45 PM
    and shukla was 75...





    hair 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
  • 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am



  • kpchal2
    08-13 09:24 PM
    also got the following response for a service request i put in. did not know what to make out of it - is it just a regular response or is this true

    The status of this service request is:

    A review of this case indicates that it appears to be outside of the normal processing times, however processing times that are posted on our internet website are approximate and not exact. This case is considered to be within our current processing time. USCIS is aware that according to the Department of State?s Visa Bulletin, there appear to be visas available however there has been an extremely large volume of case requiring visas. Therefore your category may have already reached the maximum amount of visas available, so please continue to watch the Visa Bulletin in the future to check for visa availability for your category.

    I would be damned if they issued a visa bulletin after being aware of the fact that the visas are over. this is just to cause anxiety and stress to people waiting in the line and just playing with their emotions. this is something really horrible and we should take this very very seriously if those fuckin assholes are not doing their job appropriately.



    more...


    Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. SCCA Trans Am Racing - The
  • SCCA Trans Am Racing - The



  • grupak
    08-28 05:38 PM
    Maybe you can file DHS form 7001 to the Ombudsman, and point out the self-contradiction.

    Good luck!





    hot 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. SCCA Trans Am Racing - The
  • Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. SCCA Trans Am Racing - The



  • GCNirvana007
    08-18 10:06 AM
    No, it is not always a 2 month gap. Normally RD (on your receipt), the data entry date (you see online as "your case was received on..."), and ND should be in quick succession. It was only in July/Aug 07 when due to high volumes many cases (including mine) waited for data entry for months, as no center wanted to accept that additional responsbility. Those whose cases were entered in July/Aug 07, became ahead of those whose cases were entered in Sept and Oct 07, no matter when they filed or what their RD (as the receipt). People with PD in 2005 and 2006 who got GC last year were those lucky ones who cases were entered in the system in July, Aug (and may be some in Sept) 07. My case was entered in Oct 07, although I filed on July 2' 07. I did not get GC at that time, though my PD is May 04.

    When did you get your GC?



    more...


    house 1973 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. 1970 Firebird Trans Am
  • 1970 Firebird Trans Am



  • GCStatus
    09-18 12:11 AM
    madhuvj or GCStatus,

    Thanks for your suggestion. But the problem is its not that simple. Here is why. If the same individual create multiple IDs on IV and post using multiple IDs, one for posting derogatory comments and others that are not derogatory, we can keep mum to a point, but then it just gets too frustrating. Like in this case, madhuvj and GCStatus is the same person posting from the same machine but posting as if you are two different individuals. Hence my posts. Please stop this and email/pm us your phone number and we will start the transition process. We are sure you will do a better job than us.

    You see, just like everyone else, we also have limited number of hours in a day. We can either spend our time looking at who is using multiple forum ids to post similar messages creating a false impression for other forum visitor, like the one projected in 'if i can be blunt' thread, or we can spend our time doing better things. Your actions are not helping anyone including yourself. Hope you understand.



    Holy cow - you got to be kidding man - This is getting hilarious. Show me proof its from same machine and same IP.

    I am sorry, i expected better from an admin. " If i can be blunt" is a genuine thread. Not a waste of time.

    Seriously, i lost all the respect after you keep making statements after statements without even backing up one of them.

    Amazingly you are still rude and i am not.





    tattoo PONTIAC FIREBIRD TRANS AM Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. اسطــــــــورة المــاضـــي .
  • اسطــــــــورة المــاضـــي .



  • om.vikas
    12-23 05:01 PM
    pras,

    As far i know you should your passort get corrected, if there is name mismatch in your passort & visa it can create problem for social security number.



    more...


    pictures 1969 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. Pontiac Firebird Trans-Am 1973
  • Pontiac Firebird Trans-Am 1973



  • dwhuser
    08-25 12:27 PM
    There's a soft lud yesterday on our 485 and I-140 online cases status. Although it doesn't mean anything I got a quick question. Does an infopass appointment trigger soft LUD's. Yesterday we were suppose to attend an infopass appointment and got delayed in a traffic jam and were late by 10 mins and had to cancel the appointment.
    Also we recently filed AC21 due to a change in employer. Do you think that would be the reason?





    dresses Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. SCCA Trans Am Racing - The Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. 1969 Pontiac Fire Bird Trans
  • 1969 Pontiac Fire Bird Trans



  • pappu
    09-18 12:47 AM
    Pappu, you make more sense. Let me know how i can help you. ( no accusing bud ). Its your fellow admin who is turning into a comedian.

    Please contact your state chapter to help. If you chapter is inactive, please help lead it. Get more people involved. This will be the best help you can offer. If you want to help with customer service email me at info at immigrationvoice.org your details.

    And please stop calling admin a comedian. We take this effort very very seriously. This is not a joke. You can afford to write whatever you want anonymously. But we do not. We are replying to your post in detail past midnight and taking care of other IV work at this time knowing fully well that I have to get up very early tomorrow for a busy day.

    Sometimes when I see such posts accusing IV for all kinds of reasons, I sometimes think why we are doing this work?

    Good night.



    more...


    makeup Pontiac Firebird Trans Am Top Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. 1973 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
  • 1973 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am



  • Pallavi79
    05-10 07:39 PM
    <potatoeater quote>
    I predicted last month that EB2-I will become "U" soon, and it has happened (almost).
    </quote>
    Congratulations. You have done a great job. The dos is not able to predict the future dates of bulletins. You are able to predict it. Can you give some guidence for next couple of years? That will be lot helpful to immigration community.


    <krupa quote>
    Immigration Voice should take up this issue with USCIS. Those who came to US after 2007 should get PD of the date they applied for transfer of Labor OR applied for 140. Other wise it is abuse of law.
    </quote>
    Those who came after 2005 and who got green cards should be revoked and assign pds so that who came earliar should get green card first.


    <zram1977 quote>
    Well Said...
    Is there any agenda from IV core on this issue.
    </quote>
    Is there any agenda from IV core on the issue of, " I Pallavi, should get visa" :))

    Guys. Immigration reforms are going on. participate on those instead of digging something happened while ago.





    girlfriend اسطــــــــورة المــاضـــي . Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
  • Pontiac Firebird Trans Am



  • Denatured
    03-22 09:18 PM
    Hello all,

    Just had a quick query, I've been following a lot of activity on the whole matter of multiple visa filings, of which I was completely unaware of until recently, My question here is If an applicant has his visa filed from 2 companies and both these visa's are approved OR if just one is approved and the other loses out (say because of a lottery - which I heard is likely for advanced degree quota too this year) -

    At the time of having the H1 stamped... Can a person pick either of the two companies?
    I appreciate any feedback and a source of information would really close this case

    No flames please, I, like many other MS students, have worked hard at a very different and expectedly challenging educational system in the US and after everything landed myself in a good company that wants to hire me FT and would hate that everything worked for would be flushed away in a lucky draw!

    Seems very unfair that someone should have 3 approvals and 2 other people go back home because of this. There is a big question of ethics versues survival here so I don't want to go further into that territory.





    hairstyles SCCA Trans Am Racing - The Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 1969. Autó Pontiac Trans Am 1969.
  • Autó Pontiac Trans Am 1969.



  • glen
    12-19 09:38 AM
    Contributed $20/- thru paypal.





    ns33
    07-10 02:21 PM
    It is a simple logic, when the cake gets cut it rolls down to all the people in line. If there is no cake, whats the point of arguing who is ahead in line?

    Well said. We see the community fighting with no cake in hand.

    Chanduv23 First - let me say I respect your outstanding and active contribution on this forum very much. Having said that, I'd say, you both conveniently missed the point in my post.
    I am not arguing about who is ahead in the line to get the non-existent cake - please read my post once again and point it out to me where I said anything in such regard..

    Frustration comes from the point that all the discussions take tone that all IV efforts are to help EB2 category alone. It is becoming frustrating for EB3s to keep reading posts and participating in actions when everyone keeps portraying IV effort as EB2 only effort.

    I'd request you both to please read my post again.
    All I have said is that message need to be made stronger that IV effort is for all EB community.

    By responding with who's ahead in line type of comment you both are just ignoring the situation that already exists as of today on this forum wrt EB categories. I'd venture to say that if at all you're making that feel of eb3 left out even worse than it already it.

    Apologize if I have offended anyone and will gladly take that red dot for speaking out my mind.

    As far as the lawsuit is concerned, just like all the other IV efforts, I'd gladly participate in it.

    Another possibility should also be investigated and that is re. selective enforcement of zeigler memo by some DOLs.





    msp1976
    02-05 07:02 AM
    Although it may sound ridiculous but why is everyone want to put any limits to it. If proper controls can be put in place that there are genuine jobs and candidates are genuine then there shouldn't be any limits. How come no one wants to go for this solution. It actually makes more sense then just increasing the quota or not including dependents, etc.

    No cap would be the best solution... but that is very tough to sell in Washington....That's why all this complications of asking to take dependents out of the cap and allowing overflow to go to China/India...

    As I understand, IV already made these arguments to senators and even the senators who are sympathetic to immigration are not willing to remove the cap..The only thing they would accept is that the overflow would go to India/China/oversubscribed countries....I wonder if one of the core members would comment on this.....You do not need to name names....Just a request give a description of your interactions with law makers in this regard...That would put this issue to rest.....


    theortically what longg says is correct.The system is not fair......but not many are listening to us at this point...So we have to find some way out of the situation.....


    We need both alisa and longg as members because we need more to get traction in Washington.....the only common solution for these would be to get the numbers increased somehow....Otherwise EB3-EB3-India-China-ROW keep fighting each other...you would have nothing....